Quality assurance in testing smart home appliances

Abstract

Fast-paced growth in IoT hardware and complex software integration presents a practical quality control challenge for modern household devices. This paper outlines an empirical quality assurance method tailored for testing Wi-Fi-enabled home appliances. Focusing on dynamic signal stability, transmission delays, and data loss, we evaluated a commercial robotic vacuum cleaner across realistic operational setups involving distance variations and structural walls. We collected real-time metrics for Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI), packet loss, latency, and jitter. To create a definitive threshold for pass/fail decisions, we combined these parameters into a weighted Integral Connection Quality Index ($Q$). Physical test runs show a clear operational drop-off below –70 dBm RSSI. At this point, packet loss surpasses 4.5% and latency doubles, pulling $Q$ under the critical 0.60 mark and triggering application control failures. Repeated measurements confirmed solid test consistency, with the coefficient of variation staying under 8%. Overall, this study offers testing labs and manufacturers a concrete, metrologically sound process to define product compliance and limit post-sale warranty claims.

Keywords: smart home appliances, quality assurance, functional testing, Wi-Fi connectivity, integral quality index, data transmission reliability, RSSI, packet loss

Список литературы

1. International Organization for Standardization, & International Electrotechnical Commission. (2008). ISO/IEC Guide 98-3:2008 Uncertainty of measurement — Part 3: Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM:1995). ISO.
2. International Telecommunication Union. (2021). Overview of the Internet of Things (Recommendation ITU-T Y.2060). ITU.
3. IEEE Standards Association. (2016). IEEE Std 802.11-2016: IEEE Standard for Information Technology—Telecommunications and information exchange between systems—Local and metropolitan area networks—Specific requirements. IEEE.
4. Borgia, E. (2014). The Internet of Things vision: Key features, applications and open issues. Computer Communications, 54, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2014.09.008
5. Al-Fuqaha, A., Guizani, M., Mohammadi, M., Aledhari, M., & Ayyash, M. (2015). Internet of Things: A survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 17(4), 2347–2376. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2015.2444095
6. Sicari, S., Rizzardi, A., Grieco, L. A., & Coen-Porisini, A. (2015). Security, privacy and trust in Internet of Things: The road ahead. Computer Networks, 76, 146–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2014.11.008
7. Gast, M. S. (2013). 802.11 Wireless networks: The definitive guide (2nd ed.). O’Reilly Media.
8. Perera, C., Liu, C. H., Jayawardena, S., & Chen, M. (2014). A survey on Internet of Things from industrial market perspective. IEEE Access, 2, 1660–1679. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2014.2379034
9. Montgomery, D. C. (2019). Introduction to statistical quality control (8th ed.). Wiley.

Как цитировать

Toleubay Zarema Maulenovna Quality assurance in testing smart home appliances // Central Asian Scientific Journal. – 2026. – No. 4(32), Vol. 2. – Pp. 153–156.