Greenfield Development of Canal-Based Small Hydropower in Uzbekistan: Site Screening, PPP Risk Allocation and Climate Resilience through the Water-Energy-Food Nexus

Abstract

Uzbekistan is seeking to expand hydropower while modernizing an irrigation system that supports rural livelihoods and dominates national water use. Existing canals create a distinctive greenfield opportunity: small plants can add distributed renewable generation with limited new inundation, but their output remains subordinate to irrigation schedules, water rights and climate uncertainty. This paper develops an integrated framework for converting a large site list into an investable portfolio. It combines policy and project-document review with a two-stage multi-criteria model, hydrological stress testing and normative public-private partnership risk allocation. Stage 1 applies fatal-flaw gates for water access, irrigation non-impairment, grid and land feasibility, and environmental-social eligibility. Stage 2 ranks eligible sites by water reliability, energy yield, irrigation compatibility, cost, connection, impact and sponsor readiness. An illustration shows why a high-head location can rank below a more water-compatible site. The financing design links concessional wholesale funding and local banks to project companies, standardized contracts and verified operating data. Climate parameters remain scenarios: the severe case tests a 30–40 percent water-availability decline with a 25 percent irrigation-demand increase. The paper reconciles the 8–12 GW resource range and 5.5–6 GW target range by distinguishing assessment boundaries, technical potential, program staging and date. The central finding is that canal hydropower should be developed as a governed portfolio of water-compatible infrastructure. Transparent screening, irrigation-first operating rules and efficient risk assignment can reduce development attrition and improve resilience.

Keywords: canal-based small hydropower, Uzbekistan, public-private partnership, water-energy-food nexus, multi-criteria screening, climate resilience

Список литературы

1. World Bank. (2025). Uzbekistan to Enhance Energy Production through Hydropower with World Bank Support. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2025/06/25/uzbekistan-to-enhance-energy-production-through-hydropower-with-world-bank-support
2. Government of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2023). The Progress of Hydropower Projects and the State of Preparation for the Autumn/Winter Season Are Considered. https://gov.uz/en/news/view/3347
3. World Bank. (2025). Uzbekistan Small Hydropower Development Project, Project Page (P509250). https://projects.worldbank.org/en/projects-operations/project-detail/P509250
4. World Bank. (2025). Uzbekistan Small Hydropower Development Project (P509250): Project Appraisal Document. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099052125205569067/pdf/P509250-157ae192-23c9-4a6c-ab9b-f2c8af10cce0.pdf
5. Moran, E. F., Lopez, M. C., Moore, N., Müller, N., & Hyndman, D. W. (2018). Sustainable hydropower in the 21st century. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(47), 11891–11898. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1809426115
6. World Bank. (2025). Uzbekistan Small Hydropower Development Project: Appraisal Environmental and Social Review Summary. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099052025144541135/pdf/P509250-1ed37902-8be7-4e09-b731-362c96f78d9e.pdf
7. Hoff, H. (2011). Understanding the Nexus: Background Paper for the Bonn 2011 Conference. Stockholm Environment Institute. https://www.sei.org/publications/understanding-the-nexus/
8. Rasul, G. (2016). Managing the food, water, and energy nexus for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals in South Asia. Environmental Development, 18, 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2015.12.001
9. Hamidov, A., Daedlow, K., Webber, H., Hussein, H., Abdurahmanov, I., Dolidudko, A., Seerat, A., Solieva, U., Woldeyohanes, T., & Helming, K. (2022). Operationalizing water-energy-food nexus research for sustainable development in social-ecological systems: An interdisciplinary learning case in Central Asia. Ecology and Society, 27(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12891-270112
10. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. (2017). Assessment of the Water-Food-Energy-Ecosystems Nexus in the Syr Darya River Basin. https://unece.org/DAM/env/water/publications/GUIDELINES/2017/nexus_in_the_Syr_Darya_River_Basin/Syr-Daria-FINAL-WEB-.pdf
11. Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
12. Belton, V., & Stewart, T. J. (2002). Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4
13. Vassoney, E., Mochet, A. M., & Comoglio, C. (2021). Comparing multi-criteria decision-making methods for the assessment of flow release scenarios from small hydropower plants in the Alpine area. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, 635100. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.635100
14. President of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2019). Resolution RP-4477: Strategy for Transition of the Republic of Uzbekistan to a Green Economy for 2019–2030. https://lex.uz/en/docs/7582760
15. President of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2023). Decree PF-158: Uzbekistan–2030 Strategy. https://lex.uz/ru/docs/6600404
16. President of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2020). Decree DP-6024: Concept for Development of the Water Sector of the Republic of Uzbekistan for 2020–2030. https://lex.uz/en/docs/6973364?ONDATE=11.07.2020
17. Republic of Uzbekistan. (2025). Water Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan. https://lex.uz/en/docs/7658590
18. Asian Development Bank. (2019). Uzbekistan: Sustainable Hydropower Project (50130-002). https://www.adb.org/projects/50130-002/main
19. President of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2024). The President Reviews Hydropower Facilities. https://president.uz/en/lists/view/7749
20. United Nations Industrial Development Organization and International Center on Small Hydro Power. (2013). World Small Hydropower Development Report 2013. https://www.unido.org/sites/default/files/2014-03/WSHPDR_2013_0.pdf
21. World Bank. (2024). Uzbekistan General Water Security Assessment. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099062424121035288/pdf/P1700301356bad0519ce81fc808f542aeb.pdf
22. International Finance Corporation. (2012). Performance Standards on Environmental and Social Sustainability. https://www.ifc.org/en/insights-reports/2012/ifc-performance-standards
23. World Bank, Asian Development Bank, and Inter-American Development Bank. (2017). Public-Private Partnerships Reference Guide, Version 3.0. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/e64a94b9-b0cb-51a3-b8dd-36bd7944284f
24. World Bank. (2025). Uzbekistan to Modernize Its Irrigation Infrastructure with World Bank Support. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2025/05/21/uzbekistan-to-modernize-its-irrigation-infrastructure-with-world-bank-support
25. World Bank. (2024). Central Asia Water and Energy Program: Phase 4 Annual Report. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099746310292415198/pdf/IDU-a1a38767-7689-4aee-90be-01ace53921a1.pdf
26. International Hydropower Association. (2019). Hydropower Sector Climate Resilience Guide. https://www.hydropower.org/publications/hydropower-sector-climate-resilience-guide

Как цитировать

Wang Liang Greenfield Development of Canal-Based Small Hydropower in Uzbekistan: Site Screening, PPP Risk Allocation and Climate Resilience through the Water-Energy-Food Nexus // Central Asian Scientific Journal. – 2026. – No. 4(32), Vol. 2. – Pp. 23–33. – DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23770264.